![best encryption software without fbi backdoor best encryption software without fbi backdoor](https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/reviews/01jciGTh8bUT5wFvORiELjy-10.fit_lim.size_625x365.v1627508527.jpg)
I am not discussing Windows system disks where security is concerned (its pointless).
BEST ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE WITHOUT FBI BACKDOOR ARCHIVE
Lets just examine the archive of data on an external hard drive. Examine full encryption of the OS if the encrypted archives and the OS are on the same premises. If your adversary has access to the OS used while handling those archives the security is all but useless. I would be remiss if I didn't mention a reminder note that YOU the user must be aware of the OS you are using while handling any encryption sofware. Attacks have been made on all three and they are proven to withstand adversarial assault. In the strict sense of the word all three encryption models listed in the thread so far appear to be unbreakable if applied correctly.
![best encryption software without fbi backdoor best encryption software without fbi backdoor](https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/07/protected_padlock_with_checkmark_amid_encrypted_data_cybersecurity_data_security_encryption_by_matejmo_gettyimages-872829036_cso_nw_2400x1600-100853298-large.jpg)
I would like to think I am beyond those at this point of my software development. The hidden and true sensitive data will never be discovered unless I make a serious operator error. I am masterful at constructing a volume that appears beyond super sensitive. Since I don't own the premises where archives are stored this allows me to be comfortable knowing that any pressure to an "associate" storing this data for me can be eliminated by opening the shell volume.
![best encryption software without fbi backdoor best encryption software without fbi backdoor](https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/roundups/04oA4bzVrW2DapaEkSpkSB0-1..v1571274768.jpg)
TC or VC allow for a superb construction of a solid decoy volume, which offsets my risks should an archive end up in the wrong hands. I prefer to abandon LUKS for my encrypted archives for security accordingly: In my case I commonly store extensive archives off premises to protect against fire, theft, and ultimately adversary acquisition of my data. Opinions may vary but I have looked through as much code as I can, and that is significant on these software products. For my linux system disks its is LVM on LUKS. Since I am using a Linux OS obviously the applications for me (TC and VC) are archival not system disk. Both TC and VC play very nice with Linux.